User talk:SLScool - minecraft.fandom.com

Treść tej podstrony pochodzi z artykułu „User talk:SLScool” w domenie minecraft.fandom.com na licencji CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

Happy Halloween SLScool![]

Hey SLScool, it's me Brain180 again, you know what day it is. Ofc it's Halloween, so Happy Halloween!! Obviously, I'm not making this talk just to announce that it's Halloween, I'm also gonna announce 2 more things:
1) As you might notice, 2 days ago, my progress bar just hit exactly 50%, which means I only have half or the time editing on this wiki. Now when migrating to the new wiki, I will still sometimes editing on this wiki, but not as often as I do before migrating to the new wiki.
2) As of tomorrow, I will gonna edit on some other wikis that I have talked about on my user page, which means that I will be a bit less active than before. However, this wiki is still gonna my main wiki (for now).
That's all I want to tell you, as said before, Happy Halloween SLScool! Brain180, "click here to talk" 12:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Discussions[]

Hello, can ye please add discussions here, m8? GoldenBoi123 (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)AS

No. Any other requests? SLScool 20:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

No, but why? GoldenBoi123 (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)AS

Well, this topic had been talked about in the past on the community portal, and SLScool said no, so no.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 04:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Add me as an administrator and bureaucrat[]

Could you add me as an administrator and bureaucrat? Nappi1990 (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Dude, how could SLScool make you an admin if you're literally only made one edit on this wiki.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 04:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Request to Cease Vandalism on the Minecraft Wiki Page[]

Dear SLScool, I hope you are doing well. I am reaching out to address an ongoing issue concerning your recent edits to the Minecraft Wiki page. We have observed that there have been repeated instances of vandalism and disruptive changes to the content, which violate the standards and guidelines upheld by the Fandom Wiki community. Please understand that vandalizing pages not only disrupts the valuable work of others but also negatively impacts the quality and reliability of the information shared with millions of Minecraft fans worldwide. We kindly ask that you refrain from making such edits moving forward and instead contribute in a positive and constructive manner. If you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content, we encourage you to engage with the community in a respectful way, such as through the discussion pages, rather than making unapproved changes. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in maintaining the integrity of the Minecraft Wiki. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Best regards, Mentoucher23478 (talk) 03:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion on how to update the vandalism template. I will take it under advisement. SLScool 04:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Do we need more autopatrols and patrollers?[]

Hi, it's me Brain180 again. And today, I'm gonna talk about whether we really need more autopatrols and patrollers or not.

If you look at the users who are currently have special user right on this wiki, you'll see that excluding bots, Fandom Stars, and SOAP members, the only users are: me, you, StuckInAHypickle, TavianCLirette, and ReadySettySpaghetti. And to make it even worse, the 3 last users are not even that active on this wiki, which means only you and me are active users who having special user right on this wiki. So a natural response would be "Yeah, the more autopatrols and patrollers, the better". However, on the other hand, no (or not really). Ofc, for autopatrols, you can add any users you believe are trustful to be an autopatrol any time you want, and you don't have to check their edits, but for patrollers, it's a different story. Believe it or not, even without me, Tavian, and Spaghetti, this wiki would still be completely fine as long as you're being active and there's not a lot of vandals on the wiki. So adding more patrollers is kinda irrelevant. Moreover, the added patrollers would most likely be inactive anyways, BotAntomy is a great example for this. In fact, most of the users that I documented on this page are inactive right now. Not only that but if you give the patroller right to the wrong user, then that user can do more harm than good (Titancameraisfan14 is a great example for this). So in my opinion, no, nothing will change when adding more patrollers. But maybe you have a different opinion on this (otherwise, there's no reason for me to create this talk), so there's still a chance you would think more patrollers is a good idea. If that's the case, I'd recommend giving the autopatrol and the patroller user rights to Cyril Sastrillas, DelCastillo8405, Mathew hollerman, and Minermatt122514. (Fun fact: a human body contains an average of 60%-70% water) Brain180, "click here to talk" 18:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

No response in 6 days, I'm assuming that you agree not having more patrollers on this wiki.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 19:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

That is a reasonable assumption. SLScool 14:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

this wiki is dead and we had so much fun making it wildly inaccurate[]

i’d never vandalise a wiki without “good” “reason”, but like, we don’t need this wiki anymore, and it stopped getting updated, making it slowly more and more inaccurate as it stays the same

fandom can’t delete wikis. that is fact. they be greedy. but why can’t we have fun with it

screw around

ensure that the wiki is even worse

heck i think you’re even a mod on the new thing (oh my god why am i not allowed to link to the new one)

why did you have to revert it all

more unfairness on fandom’s part?

KittyKatemonium (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC) 00:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)KittyKatemonium (talk)

This isn't unfairness on Fandom's part, it's simply following rules on vandalism and people making sure that the people who WANT to still use this wiki can do so and find accurate information.

ok sure good reason. there’s indie wiki buddy and stuff like that, but in the end, i guess that makes sense.

i’ll stop now :+1:

KittyKatemonium (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

uniuniverse
01:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

"why am i not allowed to link to the new one"

Because of vandalism. Isn't that ironic? SLScool 03:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

sigh

KittyKatemonium (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

"we had so much fun making it wildly inaccurate", guess what, we also had so much fun reverting your edits.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 03:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Block a user[]

Can someone kick Resmidon1? he types everywhere "blocks3D" and spoil many pages and i fix them! (Levi Callion (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Don't worry, they were being blocked by the FANDOM bot.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 20:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

The new pages are now becoming a problem[]

Hey there, I'm not sure why you has been inactive since a few days ago, I'm not seeing you editing or patrolling any pages for days. Maybe you're in a vacation or something, but either way, I hope that you see this message and start editing again, since you're an admin on this wiki, and without you this wiki is cooked.

Anyways, back to the point I'm talking about. So while you're being inactive, a lot of new pages has been created. The new pages are:

Giant Alex
Paper Minecraft
Bosses (China edition)
Lava Chicken
Theme park
Map:Minecraft Advancements: Minecraft
Ava
UNIS Technology

While one page I'd say is allowed (that's Bosses (China edition)), the other shouldn't since they are unofficial. These pages are just being mass created by users who just see Minecraft-related things they see online and just create them, not caring if it's or not. One exception is Map:Minecraft Advancements: Minecraft, which while it's kinda official, I feel like they still should be deleted because it's unnecessary. However I could be wrong, maybe you think these pages don't deserve to be deleted, so that's one of the reasons why I created this talk so that you can decide if you want to delete them or not. And while I'm here, you should also delete File:Ijustlostmydog.png, File:Ermwhatthesigma.png (both are literally vandalism), and Template:Cite web (unneeded template). Thanks (for like the 18th time now lol)! Brain180, "click here to talk" 20:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi,

I haven't heard from SLScool in a few days on Discord either, hope he's alright. I will delete those articles and see what else I can do.StuckInAHypickle (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey there, JEC6789 requested you to delete all of their user pages (except for 2), so you should also delete them too. As for SLScool, I feel like there's a chance he might not be active again. If that happens, you will instead be an active admin, you must respond to the vandals quickly. Also since you're only an admin and the only bureaucrat on the wiki is SLScool (which in this case he's inactive), I believe you might ask a Fandom staff (like OishiiOnIno) to grant the bureaucrat user right if you want to grant other users user rights.

Brain180, "click here to talk" 12:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Snapshots[]

Snapshots are an important part of Minecraft, could you please restore the snapshot pages? HexaRuby (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey there, sorry for the late reply but believe it or not, this had been asked in the past on the archive of "SLScool" talk page, and I answered it. So I'm just gonna quote what I said:

"According to SLScool on the Community portal, the reason why there's no snapshot articles (aside from joke snapshots) is because:

"If you've worked on snapshot articles since the fork, I want to say thanks and point out, instead of making mediocre snapshot articles, you could now focus on making really great content articles." -SLScool

If you wanted to see the snapshot articles then you should go to the new wiki, I don't really required to stay on this wiki (I'm still working on this wiki because it's my "temporary job")."

Brain180, "click here to talk" 05:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

The last day of 2024[]

Hey there, it's Brain180 again, and I hope that you see this message and be active on the wiki again since I didn't see you active for a few days now. Today is December 31, 2024, and not only does this the last day of 2024, but also the last day of me here before the migration to the new wiki. And oh boy, time really flies. I returned to this wiki on August 27, 2024, and I thought that I will a lot of time editing on this. However, those 4 months on the wiki passed like just 2 weeks. But although it's only 4 months, for me those 4 months were a lot of fun, in fact, it's the happiest time I've editing on this wiki in my opinion. On that 4 months, I'm literally be the most active and constructive user on the wiki, so much that I went from about 7600 edits to more than 10000 edits, become from the #14 to the #7 on the leaderboard, and with the help of you, I was able to massively improving a lot of pages on this wiki. And while there's still a lot of missing information, I'm confident that I've done a lot of major things to improve the wiki. Tomorrow is January 1, 2025, which is the day I migrate to the new wiki and will not be as constructive as before. Since you stay as an admin on wiki, I hope you active again and having a great year on this wiki :) Brain180, "click here to talk" 16:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Minecraft: Java Edition on Android[]

The title screen of : in an android phone. — The title screen of Minecraft: Java Edition in an android phone.

Hi SLScool, there is one surprise on Java Edition.

Normally, Java Edition is only available for computer and desktop devices. But, there is a possibility to run it on a mobile phone (Android & IOS) through a mobile application storefront, which is no other than "PojavLauncher".

- DelCastillo8405 (talk) 11:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Unless it's something officially endorsed by Mojang, it can go wherever we normally keep third-party launcher. SLScool 19:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

why keep grass block page[]

why not keep it merged to not confuse people – Unsigned comment added by Game Player 3000 (talk • contribs) at 04:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC). Sign comments with ~~~~

Grass and grass block are two very different blocks, just like dead bush and sand or mushroom and mycelium. I don't see any good reason to have them share the same article. SLScool 04:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Undelete my Shadow Mod page.[]

The mob is not a parody, comedic, nonsense or hoax page. It is a real mob shown in a YouTube video. (Esther Pearson Levi Callion (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

It is not a real mob; what you saw was probably a mod. SLScool 17:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Why Did Someone Call Stone Is A Painting[]

ITS NOT A PAINTING ITS A BLOCK ITS A BLOCK TYPE WITH A ID PAINTINGS ARE COUNTED AS ENTITIES Game Trash 3000 (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

It's just someone deciding to vandalize the wiki. SLScool 17:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Minecraft now has Full Body Movement Tracking in VR![]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/1hxurc8/minecraft_now_has_full_body_movement_tracking_in/ (Levi Callion (talk) 11:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

This is part of a mod (ViveCraft, according to one of the comments) and is therefore not something we'll document on this wiki.

thx![]

Thank you for deleting my page

Why?[]

...why have i been deleted

There a guy who adds Nonsense Information or disinformation[]

https://minewiki.pl/en:UserProfile:TwigRaainb This guy

Vandalism[]

Someone is editing the Minecraft page. spamming “I hate Minecraft” but I can’t fix it because it took up too much of the page and there was a warning. Look here. Cam13den (talk) 03:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I've taken care of it. SLScool 05:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Files[]

I began deleting duplicate files, and ended up going down a rabbit hole.
I began checking the categories the files are in.
These are all from the Medabots Mod. Do you want them on the wiki? If so, we should categorize them in maybe "Medabots Mod images" and rename them. They are currently in Category:User images. Ferretwings (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Go ahead and delete them. Since Dhranios no longer uses their account (it's disabled), they don't have any need for the images, and since this wiki doesn't cover mods very much, this wiki has no need for the images. I did notice that some of these images also appear in AlienAgent124's Image Graveyard, so if you're looking for more images to delete, that could be another list to go through. SLScool 17:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Deleted.

If we ever come across unused files that we actually want to keep, perhaps a landing page could be made for them like "Minecraft Wiki:Save for later files" to get them out of UnusedFiles. Just an idea. May never actually happen.

I began looking through AlienAgent124's Image Graveyard and I will now tackle the unused "Vector" svg files. Arrran seemed rather proud of his work and gave the description "A block of bedrock that doesn't pixelate or blur. More technically: a group for each side, the most common colour of that side is a background plane, other colors are done on a per-pixel basis. Wrote a program to do this, will optimise more later." I'm not sure what his plans were, but the user hasn't edited since May 2020. I suppose if he returns, he can re-upload. Have you any use for the svg files? Ferretwings (talk) 00:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

A+ Wiki Status[]

Hi there, I wanted to reach out because this wiki no longer qualifies as an A+ Wiki. It looks like not all admins have completed all the Admin+ courses. I’ve removed this wiki from our list. If this is a mistake, please let me know. Otherwise, if you & the other admins would like to have this wiki reinstated as an A+ Wiki, please submit an application once all remaining admins complete the Admin+ courses. pikushi ✧.* 18:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Logo license change[]

Hi o/ Could I ask you to change license template on File:Wiki.png and File:Site-logo.png to cc-by-sa? Those files are fully protected, and can't change them myself. Oakar567 (talk) 00:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Done. SLScool 12:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you ^^ Oakar567 (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

May I point out that CC BY-NC-SA, while generally considered less permissive than CC BY-SA, actually grants a right that CC BY-SA doesn't, namely the right to distribute copies or derivatives under a non-commercial licence? And licences can't be revoked, so the files are actually dual-licensed. Noisy miner (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out. I hadn't considered how the license passes from person to person and from the original work to derivatives (and how, as you pointed out, the presence/absence of NA must be preserved); I only considered whether someone could use the image commercially or noncommercially based on the license. Knowing that, I now know the old license needs to stay on the file page since it's still in effect. I also agree that licenses can't be revoked, even if the new license completely encompasses the old license (like how I thought CC BY-SA completely encompassed CC BY-NC-SA), but only up to the point where revocation clauses come into effect. Permission for works under CC licenses cannot be revoked, but permission for works under Template:License Mojang can be.

Any thoughts, Oakar567? SLScool 21:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Im just gonna say, that the file should probably be on cc-by-sa from the start. Now we have double-license mess. I mostly lifted nc part, so it could be put on wikimedia commons. Oakar567 (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

When a file has two licenses, anyone who uses the file can choose which license(s) to use. This means that whoever uploads the file to Wikimedia Commons can upload it with CC BY-SA and not CC BY-NC-SA (unless Wikimedia Commons has some specific rule against this). I suppose I could do the same for this wiki, but I don't see any need to (mostly because I'd technically have to reupload the file and I don't feel like doing that). As for "should probably be on cc-by-sa from the start": I don't feel comfortable following that on this wiki, but I suppose people on other wikis can follow that if they wish. SLScool 03:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Main Page changes[]

User:Itsjieyang changed the Main Page to say Fandom Wiki for Minecraft instead of Minecraft Wiki (Special:Diff/2317970) right after the fork went online, likely as a way to promote the fork and treat this wiki as secondary. Could you revert it? HexaRuby (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

I've asked Itsjieyang about why he made that change and I'll see what he says. Generally, however, people who work for Fandom don't try to sabotage Fandom. SLScool 22:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. HexaRuby (talk) 01:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I have addressed this topic on my talk page. TLDR: as per Mojang's guidelines, we cannot call the wiki "Minecraft Wiki". It mostly affects the main page. I changed it back to Fandom Wiki for Minecraft, however you can use different wordage. I've been dm'ing somebody who had contact with Mojang the last time they reached out, and they said the changes I made to mcw:About should be sufficient for that page. Ferretwings (talk) 07:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Ghast changes[]

Reverting changes to Ghast entry. The title field was defaulting to "Chicken Jockey" prior to this addition. So I'm not sure why you considered this to be unnecessary. There is clearly a bug in the template, so leaving it blank is just asking for it to break again. Venoltar (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

First, I'm glad that you had fixed the title in the article. Second, it wasn't actually a bug. About an hour before you edited the ghast article, someone had vandalized the template by making "Chicken Jockey" the default title. Undoing their vandalism took care of the problem. SLScool 18:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

I NEED TO ADD THE DIALOG PAGE[]

written by DidSomeoneFartOnMe:

WHY DID NO ONE ADD IT, IS THIS OLD WIKI GETTING DISCONTINUED BECAUSE THERES STILL SOME ACTIVE USERS I TRY MY BEST TO KEEP IT UP TO DATE WITH MINECRAFT UPDATES JUST IMAGINE IF THE WIKI IS MISSING SOMETHING THAT WAS ADDED TO MINECRAFT

ITS YOUR JOB TO KEEP THE WIKI UP TO DATE AND ANYONE ELSE

bruhhhhh -DidSomeoneFartOnMe, 01:08, May 15, 2025

Job? The editors and admin are not getting paid. They are all volunteers, and have lives outside of this wiki. I understand your frustration, however we depend on constructive edits from Minecraft players and wiki editors. If you wish to contribute, we would be more than grateful! If you wish to create a new page on the wiki, please see Minecraft_Wiki:Drafts. If you want ideas on how to help, see the Community portal. Ferretwings (talk) 23:06, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Cow Page Changes[]

Hello, thank you for the notice. However, I'd like to inform you that I had noticed many strange additions when I first visited the page and the additions had nothing to do with Cows on Minecraft and took it upon myself to remove them. I apologize for deleting any useful content if I did and not making clear that I was deleting irrelevant information and I will make notes in the future should I change anything. AlexPandimonium (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

you incorrectly reverted my page lol – Unsigned comment added by CursedGhoul (talk • contribs) at 23:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC). Sign comments with ~~~~

What were you trying to accomplish with your edit and why? SLScool 00:27, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Template:Java_Edition_versions[]

I am updating Template:Java_Edition_versions, and was annoyed that column 2 wasn't in line (in the last section). So I made some changes to the format, and now it looks like: Template:Java_Edition_versions/draft. As you can see, the last navbox "Full Release (1.20+)" is not displaying correctly. Any ideas why? I may do some more tinkering and make the whole template a 3-column table, which would make column 2 the same size throughout. Ferretwings (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Never mind, I figured it out. Ferretwings (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Block 2w7e2j[]

Hi, there was an recent vandalism on talk page, Can you block it? --Titancameraisfan14 12:34, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

I poured my heart and soul into those edits, and you just toss them away like a rotten salad??? Fine, my work isn't appreciated. I'm not surprised. – Unsigned comment added by Jdkfjksdfjs;fjsadk;fdof (talk • contribs) at 03:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC). Sign comments with ~~~~

I expanded the empty article on Dried Ghast, by adding information. The Crafting recipe and imagery are still needed to be added

Admin Code of Conduct Workshop[]

Hello! We’re putting together a new live workshop on Fandom’s Admin Code of Conduct (mentioned here!), & we’d love your help testing it out!

This workshop will go over the policy in more detail, including how to interpret some of the vaguer sections. Since this is our first run, we’re inviting Stars to join a trial session and give us feedback on what works, what could be better, & anything in between.

There will be two trial sessions to choose from:

Friday, June 27 at 10am Central Time

Monday, June 30 at 2pm Central Time

Please convert to your time zone here: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html

If you’d like to attend one of the sessions, please RSVP by June 26 using this form: https://forms.gle/DveooDfTpQezWWB49

Thank you, & we hope to see you there! pikushi ✧.* 20:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Can I get sysop rights?[]

I want to use them for editing and updating critical Module namespaces, like Module:Sprite. Also, I noticed that the newer Minecraft version images have a different page name structure than the older ones, so I want to fix that. HexaRuby (talk) 13:54, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm getting those abilities added to the content moderator group. Interestingly, content moderators have the permission to move images, but since they don't have the general permission to move pages, they can't actually move images (that, or you can move images right now and you just don't realize it, but I'm guessing that's not the case). You and the other content moderators should be able to edit modules and move files soon. SLScool 22:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. And could you also add the right to create non-Draft pages? HexaRuby (talk) 17:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Done. SLScool 18:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Getting Started[]

Hi. I want to help with the wiki. How would I get started? Is there a way to determine what pages could use help and how to find pages to add? Thanks. Wolfburrito95 (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Chicken Jockey Edit[]

Hi there SLScool, I am Comic-LordCMX123, (the same one who edited the chicken jockey page) I am sorry if the edit i did was unconstructive and will try thinking of ways to make it more constructive.

The big thing is that we don't want to put too many images in infoboxes. As you know, it's good for our readers if we have an image in an infobox, but they actually aren't going to gain much if we put in lots of images. It's more information than most people need. So, we give them a convenient link in the infobox that takes them to the gallery where they can view more images if they really want to. SLScool 22:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

THIS GUY. WHY.[]

https://minewiki.pl/en:Diamond?oldid=2385981

Belanket (talk)

Requesting for undeleting PojavLauncher[]

Hi SLSCool, Since you deleted PojavLauncher months ago, I think it's better to undelete it because it is very useful for users who aren't deciding to buy the original Minecraft. Also, because of vandalism, why did you delete the PojavLauncher article (no offense), rather than rollbacking the edits?

- DelCastillo8405 (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

You can check out the PojavLauncher article and view the separate deletions and their corresponding reasons (because I deleted the article more than once, and for different reasons each time). Additionally, as a content moderator, you can click on "view/undelete" to see the page's edit history. SLScool 22:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello[]

Can you give an autopatrolled and patroller to me? Titancameraisfan14 New (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

You have a new account, with zero edits. Perhaps you should make some decent edits before asking for autopatrol? If this is a 2nd account, please explain on your about page. Ferretwings (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Ok, i will do this. Thank you! Titancameraisfan14 New (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Zombie edit[]

Sorry about the grammar issue on the zombie i was in a hurry because i need to go. GamerRoham2015 (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)GamerRoham2015

Content Moderators still can't perform specific actions[]

Content Moderators can't move pages or edit in the Module namespace. Is this intentional? HexaRuby (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of MINECON 2018 Sample Add-on mobs' pages[]

Hi SLScool, I noticed that you have acted on the article drafts for the MINECON Earth 2018 Sample's mobs that I created over the course of the last few weeks - by deleting them. While I saw that you linked to the Minecraft Wiki's notability guidelines, that action merits more explanation than just sending a link. What part of the notability guidelines did they not meet: having enough information (1), pertaining to Minecraft itself (2), or features "currently present" in the game (4)? If it's the first thing, then what would have needed to be added to make those articles worth keeping? Isn't the purpose of the Drafts feature to allow articles to be assessed and critiqued honestly, so that it can be decided by consensus whether it is possible to make them good enough for the wiki? I await your response. Thank you. TavianCL (talk) 16:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

To my knowledge, we do not have any articles on add-ons, even for official add-ons, let alone articles on mobs within add-ons. Generally, if a kind of article doesn't exist—in this case, articles for mobs within article-less add-ons—there's probably a reason why it doesn't exist, and it should at least be discussed (e.g., on the community portal) before being created. I (perhaps inaccurately) used the "Doesn't meet general notability guidelines" as a catch-all for all such types of articles that we don't have. SLScool 15:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

That's a fair point with regard to the "strict" definition of an add-on; however, we do have some articles for downloaded (or "added") content already, specifically Mojang's worlds like The Human Eye and Sustainability City. Although, I was responsible for those too. Even if those are considered fair game (which I don't see why they wouldn't be), I will admit it would have been more reasonable for me to make a page for the add-on itself first, or, as you say, take it to the community portal to see if most folks see merit in having it. TavianCL (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Verify the glowstone edit[]

Can you verify this edit on the Glowstone page by Lorem77ggs to see if the information is actually true? It doesn't seem true to me. Brain180, "click here to talk" 08:12, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

It's plain-out false; I've removed it. That user named pretty much all the elements on the periodic table as being "glowstone derivatives" or whatever. Besides, it was far too unwieldy to be a note on the wiki. TavianCL (talk) 08:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Bruh[]

Why aren't the Donkey Event vandals blocked?? That event happened a year ago and they still aren't blocked??? ShadowVoid (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

If I'm thinking of the same accounts you are, then the answer is that SOAP took care of blocking them. if they are no longer blocked, then it is because SOAP didn't see any need to block them for longer. SLScool 05:05, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Ain’t this wiki dead? 😭 – Unsigned comment added by Logobrief2077 (talk • contribs) at 14:13, 26 September 2025 (UTC). Sign comments with ~~~~

Based on Special:RecentChanges, I'd say no. SLScool 20:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Request[]

Hey SLScool, can you move the page "Minecraft Wiki:The Donkey event" to my sub-userpage "User:Brain180/The Donkey event" and also delete the redirect "Donkey event"? I feel like the page is too incomplete to be an official wiki page and I just don't have time to expand the page right now (maybe in the future, I will). Brain180, "click here to talk" 18:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Alright. SLScool 18:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Hardcore game mode and the permanence of death[]

In Hardcore, once you die, there's no turning back. You will have to deal with the consequences. Using the Open to LAN feature after death does not actually revive you and just creates a new version of your game every time. And even though it would feel the same, your original hardcore world and game would be gone forever.

I still disagree. Like I've said before: it doesn't seem like the game is recreating your save folder, the world you play in after using the LAN technique is the exact same as the world you died in, and you should try to provide some proof that you are right. SLScool 18:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No, death is permanent in hardcore. Everything would be gone for good.

I did this hahahaha[]

I vandalized one page because I want to edit and test it out ❤️

Fully protect every templates that do not need to edit or change[]

Hi SLScool. Given that the templates About and For were severely vandalized, I think that you should fully protect all "structural" templates that do not require any further changes in the future. The protections are needed so that no more vandalism can happen on those templates because unlike vandalism on a page where it only affects the page itself, vandalism on a template also affects every pages that use it. Templates that may require changes in the future (like Blocks or Items) may not need a full protection though. Brain180, "click here to talk" 20:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

CSS Optimizations[]

Hey SLS! I’ll be leaving this message here on your talk page for easy sharing/reference. We have an important performance recommendation for your community.

The Context: As we mentioned in the Technical Update on October 31st, our engineering team has identified that the use of multiple @import rules in custom CSS generates additional network requests that significantly slow down page loading for your readers.

What We Are Doing: To help solve this, we are now implementing an automatic backend optimization to improve how these styles are delivered. This change is designed to be invisible and speed up your wiki without changing its appearance.

Our system will handle everything automatically, but it is possible that the load order of the imports may be altered, as they will be grouped automatically. If any style does not appear correctly, it should be resolved by changing the order of the imports. If that doesn't work, please let us know via Zendesk, and we will help you resolve it immediately.

Thank you for helping us keep Fandom fast and accessible!!— OishiiOnIno ^{( talk )} 14:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit on Bedrock Edition distance effects[]

My edits are constructive and i am fixing grammar issues. Why did you revert my edit without explanation? Omega 123456789ABCDEF (talk) 00:33, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I looked at about a dozen of the many you changes to made to the article, and I saw that all of them were copy-pasted from the other Minecraft Wiki. I assumed the rest of your changes were as well, so I reverted everything. The same is true for your edits to Minecraft Wiki:Users. The problem is that that wiki's copyright does not allow its contents to be copied to this wiki. (Another problem is that you were copying stuff without saying where you got it from, but that could've been easily rectified by me.) SLScool 01:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Block I like Banners[]

https://minecraft.fandom.com/Special:Contributions/I%20like%20Banners They started out fine but went into the dark side TheUltimateCoiler (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Looks like SOAP beat me to it with a global block. SLScool 19:11, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Wait[]

How am I patroller and autopatroller Baser (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I went to Special:UserRights/SwapperSwitch and added the roles. Last I checked, patroller does not grant the autopatrol ability, so I had to add both instead of just patroller. SLScool 21:19, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Well why am I patroller and autopatroller then? Baser (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

This wiki has the patrol feature, where every edit by most users (those without autopatrol) can be marked as patrolled by someone with the appropriate rights. In this way, every edit can be checked by someone experienced, and at the same time, other experienced editors will not have to waste their time looking at a patrolled edit because they'll know it's already been checked. I gave you the autopatrol right because I no longer feel the need to patrol your edits: your edits have been good, and I trust that they will continue to be good. I gave you the patroller right so that, whenever you Rollback an edit (a stronger version of Undo that you now have access to), you'll automatically patrol the edit(s) that you've reverted. Also, if you so choose, you can now patrol edits. SLScool 21:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

So you're handing over the patrolling job to me? Baser (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I'll still continue to patrol most edits. I gave you the patrol ability because I don't want to have to look at the edits of vandals that you have already undone (which is something that you often do). That being said, if you ever want to, you can now patrol edits. SLScool 22:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)